"));
Home > Management issues > Integrated Management and Coordination of Action

Management issues: Integrated Management and Coordination of Action

Introduction

New Zealand map showing Kaipara HarbourThe Kaipara Harbour has a complex environmental management framework.  The Kaipara Harbour, catchment and ecosystems are governed by mulitiple agencies: Auckland Council, Northland Regional Council, Kaipara District Council, Whangarei District Council, Northland Department of Conservation, Auckland Department of Conservation,  and the Ministry of Fisheries and Foresty (MAFF). There is a plethora of plans, conflicting management philosophies and a highly fragmented legislative framework. 

The land and coastal environment is currently planned and managed through:

1.      Regional Coastal Plans – coastal marine area focused – not fisheries and not MPAs (Resource Management Act 1991)
2.      Fisheries Plans – (under the Fisheries Act 1996) single fish stocks in fisheries management area
3.      Protected Species Action Plans – (Marine Mammal Protection Act 1978) such as marine mammals, seabirds – nationally focused.
4.      Regional Coastal Environment Plans – coastal environment but only policies for land areas(Resource Management Act 1991)
5.      Coastal Compartment Plans – small areas of coastal edge (Resource Management Act 1991)
6.      Iwi Planning Documents – usually covering an iwi’s rohe
7.      Long Term Council Community Plans – integrate environmental, economic and social – focus on broad outcomes for individual council and budgetary provision (Resource Management Act 1991)
8.      Marine Protection Planning – marine protected areas within a region (non–statutory Marine Protected Areas Policy Statement and Implementation Plan (DoC & Mfish, 2005) and Marine Reserves Act 1971)
9.      District Plans – (Resource Management Act 1991) assists territorial authority with addressing their functions such as, managing effects of land use, noise, and impacts of land use on indigenous biodiversity. Outlines rules to be used to implement the policies and must give effect to Iwi authority planning documents and regional and national policy statements.
10.  Annual Plans – (Local Government Act 2002 and Resource Management Act 1991) promote sustainable development, and still incorporate ecological issues, in annual planning.
 

Figure 1 depicts the current Resource Management Act (RMA) planning where there is fragmentation between land and sea planning. It is split between planning for catchments/regional plans and planning for marine areas (through coastal plans), and if a catchment has two or more districts and regions there is also split with limited overlap. Figure 2 depicts a possible pathway of integration for the Kaipara where planning occurs from the land to the sea. Recent publications by Peart 2007 and Kirschberg 2007 outlined strategies to achieve integrated management of the Kaipara.   Kirschberg 2007 reviewed policy and planning documents and whether they enabled integrated management, and Peart 2007 interviewed 60 people involved in coastal management on their perspectives of current environmental planning and issues.

Figure 1 – Fragmentation

Figure 1. Fragmentation of RMA planning system

Figure 2

Figure 2. Integrating RMA planning

The catchment is governed and managed by other statutory documents, but mostly the RMA through the preparation of district plans focusing on landuse and regional plans focusing on broader catchment management issues such as sedimentation. However, there are many challenges for the governing bodies relating to the RMA itself including the lack of a strategic focus to planning under the Act. Therefore, we have a situation where there are different rules on the land verus the coast/marine environment and then again in the north verus the south. There is a lack of planning integration across Mean High Water Spring (MHWS) which is a widely recognised problem across the country.

 Also, there is the issue of lack of planning capacity and varying resources across agencies (Table 1). Smaller councils struggle to develop and retain sufficient planning expertise to undertake their strategic planning functions and institutional memory can be lost as long–serving staff leave. This issue, together with a lack of robust information, reduces the ability to make informed decisions about development and resource use. 

Table 1: Territorial Authority statistics and approach to coastal planning (source: www.localcouncils.govt.nz and Peart (2007). (1 year ended 30 June 2005)

 

Territorial Authority
Operating Expenditure1
 
Number of Staff
Land Area
(km2)
Separate Delineation for Coast
Effect of Delineation
Rural Subdivision rules
Rodney District Council
$94.1 million
374
2,427
No
Nil
Environmental enhancement 1 lot for 2Ha protected; 2 lots for 12Ha protected (restricted discretionary); otherwise non–complying
Kaipara District Council
$26.5 million
43
3,117
Kaipara Harbour Environment Area
Additional control on earthworks and vegetation clearance (but not buildings)
4ha minimum lot size (controlled); conservation lots 1 lot for 4000m2 min protected lot size with 4ha average in subdivision & no more than 6 in subdivision

 

Opportunities for Integration

Nga Kaitiaki Tai Ao o Kaipara, see themselves as coordinating the management of the harbour, but currently lack capacity to fulfil this vision and needs the support of management agencies. Te Uri O Hau is the only management body which has a fully integrated perspective and together with other hapu of Ngati Whatua is driving the Integrated Kaipara Harbour Management Group project to create a healthy and productive Kaipara using an integrated management plan. 
 
Opportunities exist to achieve better integrated management of the Kaipara Harbour and catchment. This can be achieved through such approaches as:

Kaipara Harbour catchment 

Figure 3. Kaipara Harbour catchment

References:

  1. Peart, R. 2007. Beyond The Tide. Integrating the management of New Zealand’s coasts. Environmental Defence Society. 212pp.
  2. Kirschberg, A. 2007. Kaipara Harbour Coastal Environment Policy Review. Auckland Regional Council Technical Publication Number 345. 68pp.

Related publications

Year Author Title Type Size
2010  IKHMG   Information Review & Gap Analysis. The Kaipara Atlas: An Integrated Database. 15.5 MB 
2010  Department of Conservation   New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement 2010, December 2010 509 KB 
2010  IKHMG   The World of Kaipara. Information Review & Gap Analysis. Chapter 1 to 8. Purpose, Introduction, Historical Background and Methodology. 1.6 MB 
2010  IKHMG   The World of Kaipara. Information Review & Gap Analysis. Chapter 10. Restoring Sustainable Use of Fish & Invertebrate Stocks. 3.1 MB 
2010  IKHMG   The World of Kaipara. Information Review & Gap Analysis. Chapter 11. Restoring the Mauri of Kaipara. 2 MB 
2010  IKHMG   The World of Kaipara. Information Review & Gap Analysis. Chapter 14. Integrated and Co–operative management of Kaipara ecosystems, harbour and catchment. 2 MB 
2010  IKHMG   The World of Kaipara. Information Review & Gap Analysis. Chapter 15. Discussion. 276 KB 
2010  IKHMG   The World of Kaipara. Information Review & Gap Analysis. Chapter 16. Appendix. 2.1 MB 
2010  IKHMG   The World of Kaipara. Information Review & Gap Analysis. Chapter 17. Glossary. 186 KB 
2010  IKHMG   The World of Kaipara. Information Review & Gap Analysis. Executive Summary. 1.6 MB 
2009  Royal Commission   Royal Commission on Auckland Governance Report. Vol 1 March 2009 86 KB 
2007  Ministry for the Environment    Environment New Zealand 2007  
2007  Kirschberg, A   Kaipara Harbour Coastal Environment Policy Review 753 KB 
2007  Donald Morrisey, Catherine Beard, Mark Morrison, Rupert Craggs, Meredith Lowe   The New Zealand Mangrove: Review of the Current State of Knolwedge. 1.2 MB 
2004  Froude, V.A., Smith, R.   Area-based restrictions in the New Zealand marine environment.  
2003  Ferreira, S M., and C C Roberts   Distribution and abundance of Maui dolphin (Cephalorhynchus hectori maui) along the North Island west coast, New Zealand. DOC Science Internal Series 93. 18p. 222 KB 
2002  Davis, A.   Otamatea Ecological District: Ecological character, threats and management needs. Final Report. Draft Two. June 2002. Aristos Consultants. 125pp. 2.5 MB 
 

 


Follow us on Facebook